Law GovLaw Gov

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    What's Hot

    Associates Say Silence on Partnership Criteria Breeds Anxiety and Resentment

    August 14, 2022

    Read the Document: Judge Unseals Trump Search Warrant

    August 13, 2022

    Longstanding Linklaters, Allen & Overy German Partner Dies at 60

    August 13, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Law GovLaw Gov
    • Privacy Policy
    • Guest Post
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    SUBSCRIBE
    • Home
    • News
    • Law Firms
    • Legal Technology
    • Law Practice
    • Litigation
    • Regulation
    Law GovLaw Gov
    Home » Thirty-One Former Judges Call for Anti-Corruption Body as Australia Holds Elections

    Thirty-One Former Judges Call for Anti-Corruption Body as Australia Holds Elections

    May 19, 20223 Mins Read Regulation
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Thirty-one former senior judges have made a rare intervention in Australia’s election, penning an open letter to tell candidates that the country needs a stronger anti-corruption watchdog.

    On the eve of Australia’s federal election, which takes place this weekend, the judges wrote in their letter that they are urging all candidates, regardless of political affiliation, to set up a commission that could launch its own investigations and hold public hearings.

    “We are retired judges who believe that a national integrity commission is urgently needed to fill the gaps in our integrity system and restore trust in our political processes,” the judges wrote.

    The letter’s signers include former Judge of the High Court of Australia Mary Gaudron, former Chief Justice of Queensland Catherine Holmes, and former Judge of the Supreme Court of Western Australia and of the Federal Court of Australia Michael Barker.

    Their public comments come as controversy has arisen surrounding a campaign promise made by Prime Minister Scott Morrison that he would form an anti-corruption commission. His commission would only allow investigation of matters when there was a “reasonable suspicion” of a criminal offense, which lawyers say will neuter its power.

    The lawyers’ criticism prompted Morrison to say he has “never had much truck” with lawyers.

    In their open letter, the judges said the widely accepted case for a well-designed national integrity commission remains impregnable and the federal government enters into contracts and makes grants worth hundreds of billions each year.

    “This is public money, held on trust for the nation as a whole, to be spent in the national interest and not for unethical political purposes or illegitimate private gain,” they wrote.

    “Where billions are to be spent and significant power is available to dispense it with little oversight, greedy people with convenient consciences and powerful connections will ensure that, with the manipulation of their influence, they will obtain illegal or unethical advantage to the detriment of the interests of the general public.”

    The government has been accused of providing funding for community sporting facilities to districts that it controls and that it needed to retain to hold power—a scandal that became known as the “Sports Rorts” affair. A “rort” is an Australian term that refers to a fraudulent or dishonest act or practice.

    Australia goes to the polls on Saturday, with opposition leader Anthony Albanese’s Labor Party leading in opinion polls.

    Albanese has promised to introduce an anti-corruption body with “real teeth” by the end of the year. He has also said it would have retrospective investigative powers, which Morrison’s proposed model does not.

    Under Morrison’s plan, the government body charged with investigating politicians and bureaucrats would have no powers to exercise search warrants, hold public hearings or make public findings of corruption, criminal conduct or “misconduct at large.”

    In their letter, the judges wrote that an anti-corruption body must have broad jurisdiction and strong investigative powers, including the power to hold public hearings, and respond to bona fide complaints from the public, so that serious or systemic corruption and misconduct can be adequately investigated and exposed.

    “Nothing less than halting the serious erosion of our shared democratic principles is at stake,” they wrote.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Freshfields Adds Ropes & Gray Partner for Second London Lateral Hire in a Week

    August 11, 2022

    Thanks to US Government Regulators, Law Firms See Increasing Business in ESG

    August 10, 2022

    Risks and Rewards: What Does It Take to Be a Successful International Firm Amid Today’s Global Turmoil?

    August 9, 2022

    UK’s New AI Regulatory Approach Diverges From EU, But Shares Common Principles

    August 5, 2022

    Ex-Jones Day Partner Found In Contempt of Court in Ocado Battle

    August 3, 2022

    Hogan Lovells’ German M&A Compliance App Underscores Broader Automation Push

    August 3, 2022

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss
    Law Practice

    Read the Document: Judge Unseals Trump Search Warrant

    Francesco MazzagattiAugust 13, 20220

    A federal judge unsealed a search warrant executed on former President Donald Trump’s West Palm…

    Longstanding Linklaters, Allen & Overy German Partner Dies at 60

    August 13, 2022

    New York Law Journal Announces Its 2022 Rising Stars

    August 13, 2022

    What Impact Will the Downturn Have on Legal Hiring, and What Can You Do To Prepare?

    August 12, 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    Our Picks

    Court Pulls Info for Judge Bruce Reinhart, Who’s Believed to Have Signed Warrant for Mar-a-Lago Search

    August 12, 2022

    Are Clients ‘Ghosting’ More Law Firms? It’s Complicated

    August 12, 2022

    KSB Advises JTZE on Poline Acquisition

    August 12, 2022

    Freshfields Ups In-Office Requirements in Agile Policy Rethink

    August 12, 2022
    Law Gov
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Guest Post
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2022 Law Gov. All rights reserved. Developed by Sawah Dev.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.