Law GovLaw Gov

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    What's Hot

    PNSA and NNDKP Advise on Ameropa’s EUR 347 Million Syndicated Facility

    August 8, 2022

    KSB Advises YCM on Acquisition of Stake in Trimill

    August 8, 2022

    Liberis’ General Counsel Doesn’t Like Panels, Billable Hours or (Much) Legal Tech—Here’s Why.

    August 8, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Law GovLaw Gov
    • Privacy Policy
    • Guest Post
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    SUBSCRIBE
    • Home
    • News
    • Law Firms
    • Legal Technology
    • Law Practice
    • Litigation
    • Regulation
    Law GovLaw Gov
    Home » The World was Not Quite Ready for a Crypto Implosion, Lawyers in Asia Even Less So

    The World was Not Quite Ready for a Crypto Implosion, Lawyers in Asia Even Less So

    May 17, 20226 Mins Read Regulation
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Stablecoin TerraUSD’s $45 billion implosion last week triggered hysteria in the crypto space. TerraUSD, which is a so-called algorithmic stablecoin that is meant to maintain a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar, collapsed on May 12 and at its lowest point last week, was valued at just $0.02.

    Singapore-based Terraform Labs Pte. Ltd., which operates price-stable cryptocurrency, froze and then restarted its Terra blockchain in the wake of the collapse of TerraUSD and its affiliated Luna token. The market has since stabilized somewhat, but the crash last week has exposed the myriad of risks in algorithmic stablecoins and what the world saw as a new form of finance.

    Lawyers in Asia say whether Terra and its South Korean founder, Kwon Do-hyung, will face legal consequences will largely depend on the fact-finding process. “At this stage, the facts are still far too fluid to tell,” said Joseph Chu, a partner at Hong Kong law firm ONC Lawyers.

    The most appropriate party from whom to recover damages is the one that orchestrated the series of transactions that led to sudden devaluation, said Chu, who acted on one of Hong Kong’s first crypto litigation against a locally-based crypto exchange back in 2015.

    But lawyers involved will first have to investigate and identify the parties that hold the ultimate culpability, lawyers say. And accountability and culpability have always been problematic for disputes and investigations related to digital assets.

    Singapore-based Danny Ong, a Rajah & Tann partner, recently acted on a landmark fraud case that succeeded in recovering about $7 million in cryptocurrencies that were stolen from an American entrepreneur last year. But the culprit was never identified.

    The lack of robust legal frameworks in different Asian jurisdictions also means that investors in the region face more risk when investing in digital assets, including cryptocurrencies such as stablecoins.

    China took a hard line and banned cryptocurrency trading in 2019. In Japan, one of the world’s most technologically advanced countries, there is still no collective regulation governing blockchain-based tokens. South Korea has a strict regulatory framework governing crypto exchanges but cryptocurrencies are not regarded as legal money in the country. None of the Southeast Asian cities has established strong foundations for governing crypto deals except Singapore, which has shown a desire to embrace the digital asset sector. The city-state recently passed a law that will tighten rules for cryptocurrency service providers, but lawyers argue that the guidelines just aren’t vigorous enough.

    Even in the U.S., current laws don’t provide comprehensive standards for stablecoin issuers. The Biden administration has pressed Congress to pass legislation that would regulate issuers of digital assets as stringently as traditional financial institutions.

    Lawyers say while the lack of regulation may have contributed to the risk faced by holders of stablecoins, regulatory frameworks can only support investors in part.

    According to Timothy Loh, a founding lawyer of Hong Kong law firm Timothy Loh LLP, crypto products, unlike traditional financial products, are typically structured with a focus on technological innovation rather than on legal structures. This focus sometimes means that lawyers and other professionals with experience in managing those risks do not play a role in the product structure, leading to an increased possibility that those risks are not addressed or are inadequately addressed.

    “In our experience, a lot of times on the legal side, there are no legal terms and conditions to the crypto products. There’s only code.” said Loh.

    They also fail to consider some of the risk that more institutionalized investors would look to, particularly through professional advisers, he added.

    “There might be a YouTube video or a webpage that explains how it works but with so much emphasis on the technology, it’s easy for investors to lose sight of the fact that financial product structuring is built on decades of experience,” Loh said.

    With no mention of legal terms and conditions, it’s not obvious to investors that they should turn to lawyers with experience in financial products to evaluate the product and identify risks. “Investors shouldn’t assume that the latest technology addresses structural risks. They should assess whether the structure works or not,” he said.

    If the structure of the stablecoin is not being misrepresented as to how it works, investors are more willingly taking on the risks. But they will have little to fall back on legally.

    Chia Ling Koh, a director at Osborne Clarke’s Singapore office—known there as OC Queen Street—said that typically, there is little recourse.

    “The terms and conditions of the sale of a coin or use of a chain would have protected creators and founders,” he said. “A possibility is misrepresentation, fraud or deceit, but all that will depend on what creators and founders say or do to induce investments.”

    Lawyers who are experienced in financial product structuring will be able to help investors point out the potential risks, said Loh.

    But the well of highly experienced crypto lawyers—particularly in Asia where the acceptance of regulation of digital assets varies greatly—just isn’t deep enough.

    The practice of law in Hong Kong is still largely a paper-based occupation, Chu said. Lawyers there are eager to make money from the tech sector, but “there are very few believers and implementers,” he added.

    “This is more important than ever, as advising clients on how to obtain compensation in a situation like Luna requires a significant understanding of how the underlying technology works,” Chu explained, adding that this is essential to figuring out what happened, who was involved and who should be held liable.

    In the case of TerraUSD, however, there are still traditional legal avenues that Luna holders can pursue to recover their losses, Chu noted. The company is governed by Singapore law and the group can also be traced to Singapore, so in this case, there will be a level of governance and regulatory accountability.

    Kwon had already been involved in lawsuits with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Last year, he hired Dentons’ New York partner Douglas Henkins when the SEC accused him of violating its own rules and the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Henkins also represented Kwon when the SEC served him with a subpoena on a separate investigation involving another of Terra’s products, Mirror Protocol.

    Henkins did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    UK’s New AI Regulatory Approach Diverges From EU, But Shares Common Principles

    August 5, 2022

    Ex-Jones Day Partner Found In Contempt of Court in Ocado Battle

    August 3, 2022

    Hogan Lovells’ German M&A Compliance App Underscores Broader Automation Push

    August 3, 2022

    Ex-Cooley Associate Banned From Profession Following Fraud

    July 30, 2022

    Kirkland Fields Two Teams for €3B Private Equity Deal

    July 29, 2022

    Judging The Line Between Incompetence and Dishonesty

    July 27, 2022

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss
    News

    KSB Advises YCM on Acquisition of Stake in Trimill

    Francesco MazzagattiAugust 8, 20220

    Kocian Solc Balastik has advised Taiwan’s Yeong Chin Machinery on the acquisition of a majority…

    Liberis’ General Counsel Doesn’t Like Panels, Billable Hours or (Much) Legal Tech—Here’s Why.

    August 8, 2022

    Stikeman Elliott Nabs Longtime New York Partner From Rival Canadian Firm

    August 8, 2022

    Clifford Chance Plucks BBC Talent for Newly Created UK Inclusion Role 

    August 8, 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    Our Picks

    History Makers and Innovators: The American Lawyer Industry Awards Finalists Announced

    August 7, 2022

    Associates Expect Their Tech To Work, And Partners Had Better Use It Too

    August 7, 2022

    State Bar Plows Ahead With ‘Regulatory Sandbox’ Proposal Despite Lawmakers’ Concerns

    August 6, 2022

    Former Supreme Court of Canada Judge to Lead Review of Embattled Hockey Canada

    August 5, 2022
    Law Gov
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Guest Post
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2022 Law Gov. All rights reserved. Developed by Sawah Dev.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.