Law GovLaw Gov

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    What's Hot

    Rabner Calls In More Help From the Appellate Division, Temporarily Assigns 3 to High Court

    August 16, 2022

    Linklaters’ Corporate Head Talks Geopolitical Risk, Nando’s and Little Mix

    August 16, 2022

    The Pressure Is On: Demand Dip, Rising Expenses Squeezed Profits in First Half of 2022

    August 16, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Law GovLaw Gov
    • Privacy Policy
    • Guest Post
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    SUBSCRIBE
    • Home
    • News
    • Law Firms
    • Legal Technology
    • Law Practice
    • Litigation
    • Regulation
    Law GovLaw Gov
    Home » UK High Court Again Favors Venezuelan Opposition in $2B Gold Case

    UK High Court Again Favors Venezuelan Opposition in $2B Gold Case

    August 1, 20223 Mins Read Litigation
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer has notched another win for the opposition government of Venezuela in the long-running legal battle over nearly $2 billion of the South American country’s gold currently under custody of the Bank of England.

    Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaidó has sought to prevent the gold’s release to the regime of Nicolás Maduro, which, he contends, is illegitimate and corrupt.

    Britain recognizes Guaidó as the legitimate president of Venezuela, saying he alone has the authority to act as head of state and to decide how to use the country’s 31 tons of gold held in England.

    In a judgment siding with the Guaidó team released Friday, the Hon. Mrs. Justice Sara Cockerill acknowledged that her opinion represents “one step in a long and complex legal chain.” 

    Cockerill said that judicial efforts in Venezuela to nullify government appointments by Guaidó do not stand in the U.K. because Her Majesty’s Government recognizes Juan Guaidó as the legitimate president of Venezuela.

    “The backdrop to this issue is the ‘one voice’ doctrine,” wrote Cockerill.

    That doctrine, as summarized by the U.K. Supreme Court, states that in the U.K. “the executive and the judiciary must speak with one voice on issues relating to the recognition of foreign states, governments and heads of state.”

    Guaidó was the head of Venezuela’s National Assembly when the country’s last elections were held in 2018. Those elections, he says, were rigged.

    Under provisions of the Venezuelan Constitution, Guaidó says that he, as head of the legislature, should be the country’s interim president until free elections can be held. And he wants the Bank of England to keep his country’s gold reserves safe from potential misuse.

    The Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal of Justice, though, has attempted to thwart Guaidó’s efforts to form an alternative government by, for instance, invalidating his appointments of a Special Attorney General and members of an ad hoc Board of the Central Bank of Venezuela.

    Attorneys for Guaidó argued in the U.K. court that the Venezuelan High Court suffers from a systemic lack of independence, as it is stacked with Maduro supporters. Sarosh Zaiwalla, who represents the Maduro-controlled Central Bank of Venezuela, said the bank will “continue to pursue this case in the court to ensure that Venezuelan sovereign assets are preserved and safeguarded for the benefit of the people of Venezuela.”

    “The [Central Bank of Venezuela] remains concerned that the cumulative effect of the judgments of the English Court appears to accord a simple statement by the U.K. government recognizing as a head of state a person with no effective control or power over any part of that state, the power to dispossess a foreign central bank of control over assets held in the U.K.,” Zaiwalla said in a statement to Law.com International.

    Attorneys at Arnold & Porter declined to comment.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    ‘I Felt Like a Quota’: One Registered Blind Lawyer Lays His Law Firm Experiences Bare

    August 16, 2022

    Slaughter and May Former Fin-Tech Co-Head Retires

    August 10, 2022

    Prompted by COVID, Conflict-Averse Japan Turns to Arbitration

    August 9, 2022

    Bulgarian Oligarch Hires Morgan Lewis to Fight Magnitsky Act Sanctions

    August 8, 2022

    Slaughter and May London Associate Joins White & Case As Partner

    August 8, 2022

    Freshfields Adds Kirkland & Ellis London Restructuring Partner

    August 8, 2022

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss
    Law Firms

    Linklaters’ Corporate Head Talks Geopolitical Risk, Nando’s and Little Mix

    Francesco MazzagattiAugust 16, 20220

    Linklaters’ global head of corporate Simon Branigan has been at the firm since 1998. He was…

    The Pressure Is On: Demand Dip, Rising Expenses Squeezed Profits in First Half of 2022

    August 16, 2022

    Brandon Van Grack, Former Mueller Prosecutor and DOJ ‘Foreign Agent’ Chief, Joins Morrison & Foerster 

    August 16, 2022

    ‘A Decisive Victory for Trial Lawyers’: 40 Years of ‘Two-Dismissal Rule’ Precedent Overturned by Ga. Supreme Court in Wrongful Death Case

    August 16, 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    Our Picks

    ‘I Felt Like a Quota’: One Registered Blind Lawyer Lays His Law Firm Experiences Bare

    August 16, 2022

    Thinking of Setting Up a Virtual Law Office? Here Are Some Considerations.

    August 15, 2022

    IPO Plans Cost Mishcon Nearly £12M During Last Financial Year, Accounts Show

    August 15, 2022

    Is Lawyer High Pay Justified?

    August 15, 2022
    Law Gov
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Guest Post
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2022 Law Gov. All rights reserved. Developed by Sawah Dev.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.