Law GovLaw Gov

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    What's Hot

    Dollar’s Strength May Influence Billing, Talent and Expenses in Big Law

    August 9, 2022

    SMM Legal and Weil Advise on PKN Orlen and Lotos Group Merger

    August 9, 2022

    Herbst Kinsky Advises Helu.io on USD 10 Million Series A

    August 9, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Law GovLaw Gov
    • Privacy Policy
    • Guest Post
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    SUBSCRIBE
    • Home
    • News
    • Law Firms
    • Legal Technology
    • Law Practice
    • Litigation
    • Regulation
    Law GovLaw Gov
    Home » Lawyers’ Partnership Turns Ugly Over Money Dispute

    Lawyers’ Partnership Turns Ugly Over Money Dispute

    August 3, 20223 Mins Read Law Practice
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    A joint venture formed by attorneys to represent college students in academic misconduct cases has turned acrimonious amid accusations of extortion and racketeering.

    New Jersey attorney Joseph Lento claims in a suit that a Michigan lawyer recruited to work on his student defense cases in exchange for 40% of the fees collected is refusing to turn over the case files unless he gets paid more.

    The relationship is so strained that the other attorney, Keith Altman of Farmington Hills, Michigan, demanded that Lento pay him $500,000 immediately, or else he would file a lawsuit and a disciplinary complaint against Lento, and would notify the alliance’s roughly 100 clients that he was ceasing work on the cases due to nonpayment, Lento claims in court papers.

    Lento sued Altman, his firm and three members of Altman’s office staff in U.S. District Court on Monday, claiming violations of federal and state RICO laws, along with breach of contract, bad faith and tortious interference with contract.

    Lento seeks to enjoin Altman from abandoning or ceasing work on any files, disparaging Lento to current or potential clients, taking on any new student cases outside of the agreement with Lento, or otherwise violating a noncompete clause.

    Lento found his Mount Laurel-based firm in January 2020, and that March he formed a verbal agreement with Altman to provide services for students in academic misconduct cases, student code of conduct violations and Title IX violations, according to court papers. The terms called for Lento to receive 60% of attorney fees as attorney of record and progenitor of the cases, and for Altman to get 40% for his time and labor. And that split came after Lento deducted his marketing expenses.

    According to the suit, the venture began to fall apart in the summer of 2020, when, after an online ad campaign began to draw higher case volume, Altman failed to respond promptly to some of the clients’ phone calls and emails, forcing Lento to return retainers paid by several clients, according to court documents. Altman and his staff also fell behind on their responsibility to send fee agreements to clients in some of the student defense cases, the suit alleges.

    In addition, Altman’s handling of one matter resulted in a client posting a negative review about Lento’s firm online, the suit claims. Later, in 2021, Lento learned that Altman was sending out initial letters to clients on his own letterhead, instead of on Lento’s, according to the complaint.

    Lento confronted Altman about the negative review, saying “This is my business’s reputation on the line here,” to which Altman responded, “this is my business, too,” according to court documents. This comment made Lento uncomfortable because he never gave Altman an ownership interest in the practice, Lento says in court papers.

    Meanwhile, the roughly 100 case files are caught in the middle, in the possession of Altman but demanded by Lento.

    Plaintiffs “have the right to immediate possession of the client files for said student defense matters. Said client files exist and are presently in the possession of defendants Altman and the Altman firm. Despite plaintiffs having made demand for the return of these client files, defendants Altman and the Altman Firm refuse to do so, and thus, have wrongly interfered with plaintiffs’ possessory interest in same, the direct and proximate result of which has caused plaintiff to incur damages of both a pecuniary and reputational nature,” Lento says in court papers.

    Lento and Altman declined to comment about the case.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Amid Run of C-Suite Hires in Big Law, Goodwin Lands McKinsey Managing Counsel

    August 9, 2022

    The Marble Palace Blog: An Unearthed Cache of Letters From a SCOTUS Secretary Reveals How Unliked Some Justices Were

    August 8, 2022

    ‘Early Warning’ Over Law Firm Profits Comes as Demand Drops

    August 8, 2022

    Sentencing Jan. 6 Defendant, Judge Slams Comparisons Between Capitol Riot and George Floyd Protests

    August 8, 2022

    History Makers and Innovators: The American Lawyer Industry Awards Finalists Announced

    August 7, 2022

    Associates Expect Their Tech To Work, And Partners Had Better Use It Too

    August 7, 2022

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss
    News

    SMM Legal and Weil Advise on PKN Orlen and Lotos Group Merger

    Francesco MazzagattiAugust 9, 20220

    SMM Legal is advising PKN Orlen on its merger with Grupa Lotos S.A., which is…

    Herbst Kinsky Advises Helu.io on USD 10 Million Series A

    August 9, 2022

    Linklaters PEP Lowest in Magic Circle As Revenue Hits £1.78BN

    August 9, 2022

    Linklaters and DWF Advise on Iberdrola’s Acquisition of Wind and Solar Projects in Poland

    August 9, 2022

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest legal news from from all around the world directly to your inbox.

    Our Picks

    PKN Orlen and Grupa Lotos Merger Now Closed

    August 9, 2022

    Amid Run of C-Suite Hires in Big Law, Goodwin Lands McKinsey Managing Counsel

    August 9, 2022

    KSB Appoints Pavel Dejl as New Managing Partner

    August 9, 2022

    E+H and SCWP Schindhelm Advise on KanAm Grund Group’s Acquisition of Cross Dock Upper Austria Logistics Property

    August 9, 2022
    Law Gov
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Guest Post
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2022 Law Gov. All rights reserved. Developed by Sawah Dev.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.